Monday, May 18, 2026

Cumorah and Baja

Thanks to the Stick of Joseph podcast episodes, I keep hearing about the "new" Baja theory of Book of Mormon geography. Like this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KR9iAsqVnmM

The Baja theory has been around for decades.

One of the fundamental premises of the Baja theory is that Oliver Cowdery lied about the location of Cumorah and Church leaders, including Joseph's contemporaries, taught this lie for decades.

People can believe whatever they want, of course. But the pursuit of clarity, charity and understanding starts with clarity, so let's look at what the Baja theory proposes.

_____

Here is their explanation of Cumorah (blue) with my clarifying comments (red).

https://achoiceland.com/pdf/Approach.pdf

The Hill Cumorah 

Is there one hill Cumorah or are there two hills with the same name? 

This question has been the focus of many debates. 

There are not "many debates." The question is a simple binary: Do we accept or reject what the prophets have taught about Cumorah?

Like most controversial topics, it depends how one defines the subject of the dispute. 

Framing this as a definitional controversy is simply a rhetorical tactic for rejecting the teachings of the prophets in a way that obscures the underlying premise; i.e., the Baja theorists, like the M2Cers, reject Oliver Cowdery as a liar.

In this case, what does one mean by the name, hill Cumorah? 


There was one hill Cumorah at the time Mormon wrote his account. Namely, the hill where Mormon before his death deposited all the records in his care except for the gold plates which he give to his son Moroni (Morm. 6:6). 

The verse explains that Mormon abridged the Nephite records when he was at Cumorah. Moroni further explained to Joseph Smith, the first night they met, that the record "was written and deposited not far from" Joseph's home near Palmyra:

He [Moroni] said this history was written and deposited not far from that place [Joseph's home near Palmyra], and that it was our brother’s privilege, if obedient to the commandments of the Lord, to obtain and translate the same by the means of the Urim and Thummim, which were deposited for that purpose with the record.

 https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/history-1834-1836/68

From this we can all see that Mormon wrote his account "not far from that place." This means Mormon and Moroni lived not far from Palmyra.

That hill was in what the Book of Mormon calls the land of Cumorah, in the land northward, a land not many days north of the land of Zarahemla (Morm. 1-6). 

The first part of the sentence aligns with the scriptures, but to say the land of Cumorah was "not many days north of the land of Zarahemla" contradicts the scriptures. 

First, the phrase "not many days" tells us nothing. In 82 BC, Alma said "not many days hence the Son of God shall come in his glory." Alma 9:26.

Second, the phrase "not many days" is not even used in Mormon 1-6.

Third, Mormon 1-6 records decades of retreat from the land of Zarahemla toward Cumorah.

The land of Cumorah is where the final battle between the Lamanites and Nephites was waged and the Jaredite civilization was destroyed. The Jaredites called the hill Cumorah the hill Ramah (Ether 15:11). 

Oliver Cowdery, writing as Assistant President of the Church with the assistance of Joseph Smith, described it this way, referring to the hill in New York:

This hill, by the Jaredites, was called Ramah: by it, or around it pitched the famous army of Coriantumr their tents.... 

In this same spot, in full view from the top of this same hill, one may gaze with astonishment upon the ground which was twice covered with the dead and dying of our fellow men. ... 

In this vale lie commingled, in one mass of ruin the ashes of thousands, and in this vale was destined to consume the fair forms and vigerous systems of tens of thousands of the human race—blood mixed with blood, flesh with flesh, bones with bones and dust with dust!

 https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/history-1834-1836/91

In our proposal we place the general location of this hill and its surrounding battle grounds in northern Baja California and not in the State of New York. 

Whereas the prophets have unambiguously placed Cumorah in New York. Hence the simple binary: Do we accept or reject what the prophets have taught about Cumorah? 

There was only one hill Cumorah at the time the Prophet Joseph Smith received the Book of Mormon plates. That is, the hill in the land of Cumorah where the Nephite and Jaredite civilizations were destroyed. 

That seems plain to every reader of the Book of Mormon and the teachings of the prophets.

The hill where Moroni deposited the gold plates, near the village of Manchester in New York, is not the same hill as the hill Cumorah where his father Mormon buried all the records of the Nephite history, except for the few plates that were given to Moroni (Morm. 6:6). 

This is mere assumption, not supported by the text or any teachings of the prophets. Instead, the statement directly contradicts the teachings of the prophets.

this is the highest hill for some distance round, and I am certain that its appearance, as it rises so suddenly from a plain on the north, must attract the notice of the traveller as he passes by.

At about one mile west rises another ridge of less height, running parallel with the former, leaving a beautiful vale between. The soil is of the first quality for the country, and under a state of cultivation, which gives a prospect at once imposing, when one reflects on the fact, that here, between these hills, the entire power and national strength of both the Jaredites and Nephites were destroyed.

By turning to the 529th and 530th pages of the book of Mormon (Mormon 6) you will read Mormon’s account of the last great struggle of his people, as they were encamped round this hill Cumorah. In this valley fell the remaining strength and pride of a once powerful people, the Nephites...

 From the top of this hill, Mormon, with a few others, after the battle, gazed with horror upon the mangled remains of those who, the day before, were filled with anxiety, hope or doubt

https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/history-1834-1836/90

The Prophet Joseph Smith described the hill near his home only as a “hill of considerable size, and the most elevated of any in the neighborhood” (JSH 1:51). 

JS-History was written for a general audience who would not know what Cumorah referred to unless they had read the Book of Mormon (or Joseph's journal, or the Times and Seasons, or the Millennial Star, or the Gospel Reflector, or the Messenger and Advocate, all of which republished the Letter VII account of Cumorah).

In his history, the Prophet Joseph Smith did not call this hill, the hill Cumorah, nor did Moroni.

The excerpts above, which declare it is a fact that the hill in New York is the hill Cumorah/Ramah, is from Joseph Smith's journal, as anyone can see from clicking on the link. 

Joseph did not even write Joseph Smith-History in the first place. It was his scribes who compiled it, which is why they originally wrote that it was Nephi who visited Joseph, not Moroni. 

See https://www.lettervii.com/p/moroni-and-nephi.html.

There are other accounts of Moroni calling the hill in New York Cumorah. Joseph's mother Lucy Mack Smith reported how Joseph described that first visit, when Moroni told him 

"the record is on a side hill on the Hill of Cumorah 3 miles from this place remove the Grass and moss and you will find a large flat stone pry that up and you will find the record under it laying on 4 pillars ​of cement​"

https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/lucy-mack-smith-history-1844-1845/41

For more, see https://www.mobom.org/cumorah-overview

Sometime later, members started calling the Manchester hill, the hill Cumorah, and that name has indelibly entered into our language, most likely to stay. 

This claim contradicts the historical record, as we can all see from Lucy Mack Smith's account, as well as David Whitmer's account of the messenger who took the abridged plates to Cumorah in 1829. 

In the interest of clarity, the authors should at least alert their readers that President Cowdery formally explained it was a fact that Cumorah/Ramah is the hill in New York where Joseph obtained the plates and that Joseph's contemporaries and successors in Church leadership repeatedly reaffirmed that fact.

It would have been far less confusing if it had been given a name such as Manchester Hill (the village it is near), Moroni’s Hill, or Mormon Hill. Some residents in the area have called it Mormon Hill.

There is nothing confusion about what the prophets have taught. Intellectuals, including the Baja advocates, have sought to generate confusion by ignoring the teachings of the prophets. They are successful to the extent they mislead their followers by omitting the teachings of the prophets as they have here.

Today there is still only one actual hill Cumorah, the hill in the area where the Nephite and Jaredite civilizations were destroyed. 


Mormon describes the hill Cumorah as being in the land of Cumorah, a “land of many waters, rivers and fountains” (Morm. 6:4). 

Compare Mormon's description with the photo of Baja.

Mormon chose this land for their last battle with the Lamanites because he hoped that there they would gain an “advantage over the Lamanites” (Morm. 6:4). The nature of this “advantage” is not stated in the account. 

We can reasonably infer that Mormon chose Cumorah because he knew the Jaredites had fortified it and had a bunker where he could hide the Nephite records.

Four years were spent gathering the Nephite people to the land of Cumorah; and some 230,000 Nephite men, women and children were killed in the final battle. 

The record does not say the Nephites gathered people for 4 years. In the 380th year, the Lamaanites "did come again" (Mormon 5:6). Mormon explains that "we did again take to flight, and those whose flight was swifter than the Lamanites’ did escape, and those whose flight did not exceed the Lamanites’ were swept down and destroyed."

Rather than explain the details of what ensued and for how long, Mormon writes "And now behold, I, Mormon, do not desire to harrow up the souls of men in casting before them such an awful scene of blood and carnage as was laid before mine eyes" (Mormon 5:7–8).

After writing to the future Gentiles, Mormon explains that the Nephites marched before the Lamanites and then, after writing to the king of the Lamanites, Mormon gathered his people and they "did pitch our tents around the hill Cumorah."

It is important for the credibility of the Book of Mormon to recognize that the 230,000 number is not required by the text. Prior to Cumorah, the largest enumerated army of the Nephites was only 42,000 in 327 (Mormon 2:9). By 346, Mormon's army was down to 30,000 (Mormon 2:25). The term "ten thousand" in Mormon 6 is obviously a military unit, not an enumerated number. And the text says only that Mormon could see two military units from Cumorah: his and Moroni's. 


This is all consistent with what President Cowdery wrote, as well as the archaeological record.

Only 24 of their number survived, including Mormon and his son Moroni. The next morning Mormon and others ascended the hill Cumorah to survey the scene of destruction below (Morm. 8:2-11). The survivors, including Mormon, were killed by the Lamanites; and Moroni remained to record these last events (Morm. 8:2). 

All accurate.

The Book of Mormon account says the hill Cumorah is near the hill Shim in the land northward. And the hill Shim is where Ammaron deposited the Nephite records that Mormon later retrieved (Morm. 1:3; 4:23; Ether 9:3). We don’t know the precise locations of these two hills, but in our proposal we indicate a possible setting within northern Baja California. 

We do know the precise location of Cumorah if we believe the prophets.

There are hills in this area with features that match the geographical descriptions in the Book of Mormon. 

Every proposed Book of Mormon geography has "features that match," by definition, including Malaysia, Eritrea, Peru, M2C, Panama, Tasmania, and Baja. That's why the first question to answer is whether we accept or reject what the prophets have taught.

Someday we may be able to identify the exact location of the hill Cumorah and the hill Shim. 

That "someday" is every day if we accept the prophets.

And someday we may know more about how Moroni transferred the plates in his care to the hill near Manchester, New York.

That "someday" is every day if we accept the prophets.

The name Cumorah is mentioned in Doctrine and Covenants 128:20. It is not clear if the name refers to the land of Cumorah, or the hill Cumorah, or if it is a general term for the lands where Mormon and Moroni penned the glad tidings of the Book of Mormon record.   

When people actually read D&C 128:20, they see that Moroni told Joseph about Cumorah before Joseph ever got the plates:

20 And again, what do we hear? Glad tidings from Cumorah! Moroni, an angel from heaven, declaring the fulfilment of the prophets—the book to be revealed.

(Doctrine and Covenants 128:20)

That verse corroborates what President Cowdery, Lucy Mack Smith, David Whitmer, Brigham Young, and many others taught about the New York Cumorah.


_____

Comment on the Stick of Joseph video:

The same date palms, flora, and seeds found in Baja, CA around Spanish Missions are found in Florida. Brought also by Spanish Priests that set up Missions
7
Date palms in Florida are not productive of fruit. They need drier air.
 @rcmonks . The point isn’t whether they were viable or not, but that Spanish Missionaries brought them in the 1500’s. In their last video they speculated that Missionaries only brought them to Mainland Mexico and not Baja, but that’s not what the historical data shows. The same species in Florida and Baja are related to Middle Eastern species, brought to Northern Africa, then to Spain and on to the New World. Dates in Baja is hardly evidence for Lehi landing there



Sunday, April 19, 2026

How many died at Cumorah?

This is a legacy post that I realized I never published.

_____

One of the reasons why M2Cers reject the New York Cumorah is their belief that the Book of Mormon describes massive battles that are not evident in the archaeological record around Cumorah/Ramah. 

Their belief is based on assumptions and inferences, not facts. I've discussed FAITH model before as a method for separating Facts from Assumptions, Inferences and Theories.

One example of assumptions and inferences is the number of people who died at Cumorah/Ramah during the Jaredite and Nephite battles. I've discussed the topic here:

https://www.lettervii.com/p/cumorah-and-population-numbers.html

Many people have proposed that 2 million Jaredites died at Ramah and that 230,000 Nephites died at the same hill, called by them Cumorah. For example, the chart at BYU Studies claims this:


https://byustudies.byu.edu/further-study-chart/138-the-two-final-battles/

Let's examine the assumptions behind those estimates.

First, the extrinsic evidence corroborates what Joseph and Oliver taught about the New York Cumorah/Ramah. For example, when Heber C. Kimball visited Cumorah after he was baptized in 1832 he said he could see the embankments around the hill. He was familiar with other hilltop fortifications in the area.

There are many Hopewell sites in western New York, most of which were rudimentary fortifications, as if the people coming from Ohio were in retreat. I've visited several myself along with an archaeologist who gave me a list of such sites. Museums and private collectors (and farmers) have numerous artifacts from the area.

Second, I agree with the M2Cers that there is not evidence of millions of people dying at Cumorah/Ramah in New York, nor even of hundreds of thousands. But these numbers are mere assumptions not required by the text.

Third, in Letter VII, Oliver Cowdery explained that there were thousands of Jaredites killed (not even 10,000) and tens of thousands of Nephites/Lamanites (not even 100,000). That is consistent with the archaeology of the area.

And Oliver's explanation is also consistent with the text.

_____

Nephites

We can all read Mormon 6, which refers to "my ten thousand," the "ten thousand of Gidgiddonah," etc. Some people think those are literal numbers, as if Mormon would have written "my nine-thousand nine-hundred and ninety-seven" if he had lost 3 men before they reached Cumorah. 

Maybe so.

But a more plausible reading treats "ten thousand" as a military unit, as discussed in the Page linked to above. A military unit designated as "ten thousand" would retain the designation no matter how many casualties they suffered. There could have been only a few thousand left by the time they reached Cumorah.

Oliver Cowdery said there were tens of thousands of dead, not more than 100,000 and possibly as few as 20,000. The bodies were left unburied, so there would be little evidence remaining after a few years.

"their flesh, and bones, and blood lay upon the face of the earth, being left by the hands of those who slew them to molder upon the land, and to crumble and to return to their mother earth." (Mormon 6:15)

Separate from the common usage of "ten thousand" as a military unit instead of specific number of people, there's another interesting detail regarding the number 10.

In the 1808 edition of the works of Jonathan Edwards, on sale in the Palmyra bookshop that Joseph frequented in the 1820s, Edwards made this comment:

Mr. Lowman, in the preface to his Paraphrase on the Revelation, page viii, observes as follows: "Prophetic numbers do not always express a determinate duration or space of time, any more than they always express a certain number. Prophecy, I acknowledge, uses numbers sometimes as other expressions, in a figurative meaning, as symbols and hieroglyphics. Thus the number 'seven,' sometimes does not denote the precise number seven: but figuratively denotes perfection, or a full and complete number: and the number 'ten,' sometimes does not mean precisely ten in number, but many in general, or a considerable number."

This suggests that Joseph may have used the term "ten thousand" to represent "a considerable," but not precise, number.

(For more information on the influence of Jonathan Edwards, see https://www.mobom.org/jonathan-edwards)

Footnote 7 in the Yale online collection, here:

http://edwards.yale.edu/archive?path=aHR0cDovL2Vkd2FyZHMueWFsZS5lZHUvY2dpLWJpbi9uZXdwaGlsby9nZXRvYmplY3QucGw/Yy40OjUud2plby4xMjM4NTg5LjEyMzg1OTMuMTIzODYwMQ== 

This note is found in Volume 3 of the 1808 Edwards' collection on page 446.



(click to enlarge)


Jaredites. The BYU Studies chart doesn't give a citation, but the number "two millions" shows up only in Ether 15:2.

1 And it came to pass when Coriantumr had recovered of his wounds, he began to remember the words which Ether had spoken unto him.

2 He saw that there had been slain by the sword already nearly two millions of his people, and he began to sorrow in his heart; yea, there had been slain two millions of mighty men, and also their wives and their children.

3 He began to repent of the evil which he had done; he began to remember the words which had been spoken by the mouth of all the prophets, and he saw them that they were fulfilled thus far, every whit; and his soul mourned and refused to be comforted.

(Ether 15:1–3)

I've wondered why anyone ever thought two million people were killed at Ramah/Cumorah.

The text is crystal clear that Coriantumr's reflection took place four years prior to the final conflict at Ramah. 

[Note: the chapter heading is misleading when it says "millions of the Jaredites are slain in battle." The text tells us specifically that "millions of the Jaredites had been slain" well before the battle at Ramah.]

In the interim, Coriantumr "began to repent," he wrote to Shiz, he was wounded in another battle, and  his armies prevailed against the armies of Shiz. Coriantumr and his armies pitched their tents at Ramah (Ether 15:11) and then spent 4 years gathering together the people (verse 14) 

In verse 2, Coriantumr was not prophesying that "two millions" would be killed at Ramah; to the contrary, he remembered that two millions "had been slain" long before the final battle at Ramah.

The scriptures do not explain how far back Coriantumr was counting, but presumably he was familiar with the history of his people. As a military man, he also would be familiar with the history of wars, which suggests he was thinking back over the centuries since his ancestors arrived. Ether's enumerated pedigree goes back 32+ generations. 

This would be roughly 1,000 years, given the gaps in Ether's genealogy. Two million deaths in battle over that long a time frame is 2,000 deaths/year. Presumably that would have varied considerably during times of peace and war, but it indicates a much smaller Jaredite population than some have assumed.

Working backward from the casualties enumerated in the text (verses 15-29), we can reasonably infer that the final week-long battle involved no more than 10,000 people. 

Which is how Oliver Cowdery described it in Letter VII; i.e., only "thousands" of Jaredites died at Ramah. Not even ten thousand.

That is still a large number, given the archaeological record in the area, but it is not inconsistent with that record.

IOW, it would be highly unlikely to find evidence of such battles that occurred over 2,000 years ago for the Jaredites, and 1600 years ago for the Nephites, apart from the stone weapons that are abundant in western New York.





Friday, March 27, 2026

"the" book, not "this" book

Regarding the two sets of plates, readers recently reminded me of this point that I've discussed before.



Notice Nephi did not refer to "this book" but "the book." If he knew that his own writings were going to be witnessed by the Three Witnesses, he naturally would have written "this book."

Therefore the original plates of Nephi (the small plates) that included what is now 1 and 2 Nephi were not the plates that the 3 witnesses testified of.

Notice also that the 3 witnesses did "testify to the truth of the book and the things therein" when they declared "And we also know that they have been translated by the gift and power of God, for his voice hath declared it unto us; wherefore we know of a surety that the work is true."

(Testimony of Three Witnesses, 1)

But the eight witnesses did not testify to the truth of the book. They merely testified that they saw and handled the plates.

That's one reason I infer that the eight witnesses saw the plates of Nephi, not the abridged plates.

I've discussed aspects of this here:



_____

Verse 13 is sometimes interpreted to extend to the 8 witnesses. 

13 And there is none other which shall view it, save it be a few according to the will of God, to bear testimony of his word unto the children of men; for the Lord God hath said that the words of the faithful should speak as if it were from the dead.

That's a reasonable interpretation, but it does not seem to explicitly refer to the 8 witnesses because they did not "bear testimony of his word," only that they saw and handled plates.

Another way to interpret verse 13 uses this punctuation and indicates that others may have seen "the book" (the abridged plates) without testifying about their experience. For example, Josiah Stowell never "testified" that he had seen the abridged plates until he was asked in court, when he did bear that testimony, but even then he did not "testify to the truth of the book" as the Three Witnesses did. 

Wherefore, at that day when the book shall be delivered unto the man of whom I have spoken, the book shall be hid from the eyes of the world, that the eyes of none shall behold it save it be that three witnesses shall behold it, by the power of God, besides him to whom the book shall be delivered; and they shall testify to the truth of the book and the things therein (and there is none other which shall view it save it be a few according to the will of God) to bear testimony of his word unto the children of men; for the Lord God hath said that the words of the faithful should speak as if it were from the dead.

(2 Nephi 27:12–13)

Yet another way to look at this is in parallel format, suggesting that these passage are merely restating the point (i.e., that "three witnesses" and "a few" refer to the same people).

Wherefore, at that day when the book shall be delivered unto the man of whom I have spoken, the book shall be hid from the eyes of the world,

that the eyes of none shall behold it

save it be that three witnesses shall behold it, by the power of God,

besides him to whom the book shall be delivered; and

they shall testify to the truth of the book and the things therein.

And there is none other which shall view it,

save it be a few according to the will of God,

to bear testimony of his word unto the children of men;

for the Lord God hath said that the words of the faithful should speak as if it were from the dead.

Always fun to consider multiple working hypotheses.


_____

(2 Nephi 27:6–32)

6 And it shall come to pass that the Lord God shall bring forth unto you the words of a book, and they shall be the words of them which have slumbered.

7 And behold the book shall be sealed; and in the book shall be a revelation from God, from the beginning of the world to the ending thereof.

8 Wherefore, because of the things which are sealed up, the things which are sealed shall not be delivered in the day of the wickedness and abominations of the people. Wherefore the book shall be kept from them.

9 But the book shall be delivered unto a man, and he shall deliver the words of the book, which are the words of those who have slumbered in the dust, and he shall deliver these words unto another;

10 But the words which are sealed he shall not deliver, neither shall he deliver the book. For the book shall be sealed by the power of God, and the revelation which was sealed shall be kept in the book until the own due time of the Lord, that they may come forth; for behold, they reveal all things from the foundation of the world unto the end thereof.

11 And the day cometh that the words of the book which were sealed shall be read upon the house tops; and they shall be read by the power of Christ; and all things shall be revealed unto the children of men which ever have been among the children of men, and which ever will be even unto the end of the earth.

12 Wherefore, at that day when the book shall be delivered unto the man of whom I have spoken, the book shall be hid from the eyes of the world, that the eyes of none shall behold it save it be that three witnesses shall behold it, by the power of God, besides him to whom the book shall be delivered; and they shall testify to the truth of the book and the things therein.

13 And there is none other which shall view it, save it be a few according to the will of God, to bear testimony of his word unto the children of men; for the Lord God hath said that the words of the faithful should speak as if it were from the dead.

14 Wherefore, the Lord God will proceed to bring forth the words of the book; and in the mouth of as many witnesses as seemeth him good will he establish his word; and wo be unto him that rejecteth the word of God!

15 But behold, it shall come to pass that the Lord God shall say unto him to whom he shall deliver the book: Take these words which are not sealed and deliver them to another, that he may show them unto the learned, saying: Read this, I pray thee. And the learned shall say: Bring hither the book, and I will read them.

16 And now, because of the glory of the world and to get gain will they say this, and not for the glory of God.

 17 And the man shall say: I cannot bring the book, for it is sealed.

 18 Then shall the learned say: I cannot read it.

19 Wherefore it shall come to pass, that the Lord God will deliver again the book and the words thereof to him that is not learned; and the man that is not learned shall say: I am not learned.

20 Then shall the Lord God say unto him: The learned shall not read them, for they have rejected them, and I am able to do mine own work; wherefore thou shalt read the words which I shall give unto thee.

21 Touch not the things which are sealed, for I will bring them forth in mine own due time; for I will show unto the children of men that I am able to do mine own work.

22 Wherefore, when thou hast read the words which I have commanded thee, and obtained the witnesses which I have promised unto thee, then shalt thou seal up the book again, and hide it up unto me, that I may preserve the words which thou hast not read, until I shall see fit in mine own wisdom to reveal all things unto the children of men.

23 For behold, I am God; and I am a God of miracles; and I will show unto the world that I am the same yesterday, today, and forever; and I work not among the children of men save it be according to their faith.

 24 And again it shall come to pass that the Lord shall say unto him that shall read the words that shall be delivered him:

25 Forasmuch as this people draw near unto me with their mouth, and with their lips do honor me, but have removed their hearts far from me, and their fear towards me is taught by the precepts of men—

26 Therefore, I will proceed to do a marvelous work among this people, yea, a marvelous work and a wonder, for the wisdom of their wise and learned shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent shall be hid.

27 And wo unto them that seek deep to hide their counsel from the Lord! And their works are in the dark; and they say: Who seeth us, and who knoweth us? And they also say: Surely, your turning of things upside down shall be esteemed as the potter’s clay. But behold, I will show unto them, saith the Lord of Hosts, that I know all their works. For shall the work say of him that made it, he made me not? Or shall the thing framed say of him that framed it, he had no understanding?

28 But behold, saith the Lord of Hosts: I will show unto the children of men that it is yet a very little while and Lebanon shall be turned into a fruitful field; and the fruitful field shall be esteemed as a forest.

29 And in that day shall the deaf hear the words of the book, and the eyes of the blind shall see out of obscurity and out of darkness.

30 And the meek also shall increase, and their joy shall be in the Lord, and the poor among men shall rejoice in the Holy One of Israel.

31 For assuredly as the Lord liveth they shall see that the terrible one is brought to naught, and the scorner is consumed, and all that watch for iniquity are cut off;

32 And they that make a man an offender for a word, and lay a snare for him that reproveth in the gate, and turn aside the just for a thing of naught.


_____

Our current Book of Mormon is Mormon’s  abridgment. Minus the lost manuscript replaced with the small plates of Nephi and the sealed portion which contains a revelation of the world similar to John’s - seen and mentioned as proof that it exists for a future time. Maybe not to come forth until after the Second Coming-similar to the Brother of Jared’s record to not come forth until after the Savior was raised on the cross and resurrected.

Mormon used the small plates which contained Nephi’s prophecies of the future, as a guide to write his abridgment to prove those prophecies came true.

Thus Mormon being the last of his civilization was passing on its knowledge of God to the next civilization, in an abridgment.

The loss of the manuscript revealed the guide for or outline of Mormon’s writings. Which the Lord said had greater views on his gospel. D&C 10:45

Then in 46 he says the remainder of Mormon’s abridgment contains the fulfilled history.


45 Behold, there are many things engraven upon the plates of Nephiwhich do throw greater views upon my gospel; therefore, it is wisdom in me that you should translate this first part of the engravings of Nephi, and send forth in this work.
46 And, behold, all the remainder of this work does contain all those parts of my gospel which my holy prophets, yea, and also my disciples, desired in their prayers should come forth unto this people.